I am a first-born.
This probably comes as no shock to you, seeing as how I am all things typical when it comes to being a first-born.
I'm a leader. I'm bossy. I'm Type-A. I'm a worrier. I'm talkative. I'm a perfectionist. I'm a teacher's pet. I'm reliable and timely to a fault. I'm a cope-r. I'm driven but a bit of a steam-roller. I'm maternal. I am, and have always been, going on the approximate age of 65.
I've lived my whole life this way. It is in my nature. And, honestly, I've never thought much about it.
Until I got pregnant. With our first child.
Our first-born.
Baby Girl here is going to have the same role in our family as I did in mine: The loud, bossy, old-at-heart big sister.
Just ask my two younger brothers. They'll tell you. They'll tell you all about what it's like to have me as the family's oldest.
Just be warned: They may gripe a little.
Still, I have to admit, I like it. I've always liked it. I have lots of friends who are babies of their families. Heck, I married one. And while I adore them and their care-free natures, I swear, sometimes, they make me want to give them all a lecture on timeliness and punctuality.
And then, those middle children. Those poor, sensitive middle children. I don't understand them. I'm empathetic toward them, true. But I just don't get them, you know? When my brother - the classic middle child - talks through something or justifies a certain action of his, I just end up staring at him as if he's got two heads. I love him, but I also think he's bizarre.
Still, the fact remains that this child in my belly is not going to be my only child. We want at least four kids, whether they come from us or are adopted. So I will have to raise middle children and a youngest child. I will be the mother of more than just my first-born.
This, frankly, terrifies me.
Just a few weeks ago, at my baby shower, after all was said and done, I actually got a bit emotional about it.
I had just finished sorting through beautiful, home-made baby blankets; sweet, hand-sewn baby blocks and toys; a one-of-a-kind quilt, and - the final nail in my emo-pregnancy coffin - a beautiful book named
"Who Loves [Our Baby Girl's Name?]"In the book, our family members and close friends had scrap-booked pages together, filled with pictures of them and us and perfectly written letters to our first-born Baby Girl.
The letters brought tears to my eyes almost immediately. They were funny and sweet and told our daughter all about who they were and how much they already loved her.
It was one amazing gift, and I knew that, as long as she lived, my daughter was going to treasure that book.
Then, it hit me.
What about our next baby?
Our future-future son or daughter.
I knew without a shadow of a doubt that my family and friends would love our second child just as much as they loved Baby Girl, but my concern lay more along the lines of,
"Will that child know it?"After all, as a toddler, it's easy to count grapes in a bowl and yell,
"Sissy has more than me!" But it's not always so tangible to see the love that we adults carry for the younger generations in our families.
I can almost picture the day when I'll be sitting on the floor of my living room, two or three kids around me, digging through the memory boxes I've started for them all.
Baby Girl will pull out her baby blankets. Her homemade quilt. Her precious family book.
And Child #2? He or she will be left with holding an old teddy bear and wondering,
"Where's my book? Where's my letter from Aunt Sarah?"It's enough to break my heart, honestly. Even if I, as a first-born, never really had to experience that.
I am the child in the family with memento after memento. My mother has more pictures of my first year of life than any other time in our family history. There are photos of me smiling, not smiling, sitting, standing, laying down, pooping, eating watermelon, laughing, crying, and crawling around with a Christmas bow stuck to my butt.
My brothers? Not so much. Somewhere, in some box, my mother does have some photos of them. But, especially for the baby in the family, they are much fewer and far between.
Even those that she does have tend to also bear her other children in them.
Poor Brad, my littlest brother. I doubt he so much as has one infant photo of himself where he's not surrounded by a 6-year-old yours truly and a somber toddler.
(In true, middle-child fashion, the second-born in our family was a bit shy around the camera.)
Not that my parents didn't try. They adored us all and loved us all and never played favorites.
But my mother was too busy to scrapbook pictures of her third child. She was running around driving her first-born to kindergarten and potty-training her second.
It got so bad that, when Brad was but 4 or 5 years old, my mother had signed him up for pre-school soccer. She was taking him to his first practice, and on her way, she dropped 10-year-old me off at gymnastics and my 7-year-old brother at basketball practice.
Brad then promptly threw a fit and refused to go to soccer. My mother couldn't figure out why until she finally wheedled out of him,
"Why don't Brittany and Brett have to come watch me at my practice? It's not fair!"The poor kid had a point. He'd been dragged to our various events and practices and games and recitals since he'd popped out of the womb. He'd been breast-fed on bleachers, napped on auditorium chairs, and entertained and fed into submission during birthday parties.
And finally, just when he thought he was going to get revenge - we were going to have to wait on
him for a change - his dreams were dashed.
Poor, poor baby.
It's the burden you bear, I guess, not being the first-born child.
Then again, there were definite advantages to being the baby, too. Especially on the flip-side.
By the time Brad's teenage years hit, my parents had mellowed out quite a bit.
He got away with things I'd never gotten away with. He spent years and years alone with my parents, something I hadn't done since I was 2.5 years old. He didn't have to fight over Friday-night pizza toppings or share his ice cream.
The kid had the house and our parents all to himself.
Still,
I have a box full of memorabilia. His isn't so impressive.
I graduated college and shared the spotlight with no one. When he finishes college, he will share the spotlight with our new baby and my other brother's recent wedding.
You could chalk it all up to the fact that life's just not fair.
Then again, that seems a bit cruel. Especially when you're talking about children.
So, yeah, I worry.
I look at how immeasurably blessed Baby Girl has been - with gifts and love and people calling and checking in on me and her daily - and I worry that my other children won't have that.
My other kids will be old-hat by then. We won't be new parents. My parents won't be new grand-parents. Baby #2 will be born into the shadow that's inevitably cast by every first-born.
Not that he or she won't be any less loved.
And not that he or she won't be any less wanted.
Even now, sitting here, barely able to contain the immeasurable love I already feel for this baby in my belly, I know my heart will grow enough to fit the next one. And the one after that. And the one after that.
It's common knowledge that we don't simply run out of love.
But the fact remains that, when my subsequent children dig through their boxes of life, will they know it? Will they figure out that we - and all those around us - wanted them just as bad as our first? Will they know that, even if their receiving blanket was a hand-me-down, that we were just as thrilled bringing them home wrapped up in it as we were Baby Girl?
Will they know that we will never love another child more than we love them?
I hope so.
I think so.
I just wish I was sure.
***
I have made vain attempts and promises to myself, as I sit and sew Baby Girl's quilt or work on her scrapbook, that I will make myself do the same thing for our subsequent children.
But history and logic are not on my side. Too many moms have tried and failed.
And, yet, when you ask my brothers, my friends who are the babies in their family, and the middle children I know and love, if they felt any less love and affection from their parents, they will most likely tell you
"No."Or, at the very least, not when they look back on their childhoods as adults.
So how do we do that? How do we let our children know that we love them all equally? That life just means second-and third-born kids may not get as much one-on-one affection but that they are equally important to our family structure?
Am I the only one who worries about this? Is this just another manifestation of my first-born personality? Or is this a legitimate concern carried around by parents everywhere?
I'd love your input on this one! We're all somebody's child, even if we aren't mothers yet. So this is something we can all relate to!
Share below!
***
Happy Thursday, everyone!